If
Christian Prophecy is bogus
- Why are they doing EXACTLY
as Christian Prophecy
predicted?
Verses
used to claim Sunday is now
the Christian Sabbath:
The Page in
RUSSIAN (docx version)
This page
available in TRACT format
Bible
Proof: The Seventh Day IS
the Christian Sabbath
This page on Video
$5000.00 for ONE
Bible verse that says Sunday
is Sabbath
BILLIONS will
soon Blaspheme the Holy Ghost
Amos
8:11 declared long ago an end time
warning - "Behold, the days come,
saith the Lord GOD, that I will
send a famine in the land, not a
famine of bread, nor a thirst for
water, but of hearing the words of
the LORD:"
As prophesied, most Christians
refuse to open Bibles today to
verify what their pastors say. In
this age of convenience, they have
been conditioned to trust the
pastors without question. This
prophesied "lukewarm" mindset, as
Revelation 3:16 calls it, has
given rise to false preachers all
around the world. These wolves in
sheep's clothing can easily lie to
their congregations knowing with
absolute confidence that the
majority of their victims will
never check up on them. As for the
small number of Christians that do
investigate their false message
using the Bible, they are quickly
kicked out of the churches so as
to prevent the truth from
spreading. To keep those remaining
in the church happy, they now
preach prosperity messages on how
to gain wealth, amusing sermons,
and even rock music mixed with
Gospel lyrics to keep the people
entertained. As prophesied, they
then use false doctrines that all
the world agrees with to make
their flock feel they are safe and
doing the right thing with the
thought that since everyone else
believes in this way it must be
right. Case in point, one of the
oldest and most successfully
evangelized false doctrines has to
be the so-called Sunday sabbath.
In this tract we will look at the
verses they claim are saying the
Sabbath has been changed from the
seventh day to the first day of
the week.
CLAIM #1. Acts
20:7 "And upon the first [day] of
the week, when the disciples came
together to break bread, Paul
preached unto them, ready to
depart on the morrow; and
continued his speech until
midnight."
This meeting was held at night. If
you read on you also find in the
next verse it mentions the "many
lights in the upper
chamber." Later in
verse 11 it also states after they
ate, Paul "talked a long while,
even till break of
day." The question then is,
are they saying this a church
service because they broke bread,
and since it was on the "first
day" it must mean the Sabbath was
changed? Problem with that thought
is, in Acts 2:46 it says that they
normally continued
".daily .breaking bread from
house to house." Since they define
this is a church service, this
must be the format the church must
emulate today. If Acts 20:7 is the
definitive proof we need to
validate Sabbath being changed
from the seventh day to the first
day of the week, then all Sunday
keeping churches must...
Hold church at NIGHT
Hold church EVERY NIGHT
Hold church TILL THE BREAK OF DAY
CLAIM #2.
I Corinthians 16:2 "Upon the first
[day] of the week let every one of
you lay by him in store, as [god]
hath prospered him, that there be
no gatherings when I come."
There is absolutely no reference
whatsoever of a public meeting, or
church service mentioned here for
when Paul arrives. Some declare
this to be a church service
because Paul is gathering what
they call "tithes." But if you
read past the verse they give out
of context, you find the word
"liberality" is actually used to
describe this offering in verse #3
of that same chapter. That word
defined is "monetary gift" in
Strong's Bible Concordance.
(#5485) Also notice Paul is asking
for that to be given from what
"God hath prospered" in the
passage given to sanction Sunday
as sabbath. I ask, is this normal
tithing practices of a church
service to give from what God has
prospered which is now stored in
savings? Is not Luke 18:12 rather
plain wherein it says, "I give
tithes of all that I possess."
Biblical truth is, it's not a
church service because first and
foremost it's never declared as
such. Nor is it tithing that Paul
is gathering, which for some
reason they claim makes it a
church service. Paul was gathering
what we call "love offerings"
today. Finally, if the entire
passage is read in context, it's
discovered the passage is actually
about Paul stopping by on his way
to Jerusalem to pick up financial
relief for the Christians in
financial distress in Jerusalem.
(See Romans 15:26, & Acts
11:26-30 which also confirm this
as fact.)
CLAIM #3.
Revelation 1:10 "I was in the
Spirit on the Lord's day, and
heard behind me a great voice, as
of a trumpet"
Some use this verse to declare
Sunday is now Sabbath simply
because John uses the term "the
Lord's day." Truth is, the
Scriptures already define the
seventh day Sabbath as the Lord's
day thousands of years prior in
Isaiah 58:13 wherein we find the
Lord calling, ".the sabbath, .my
holy day;" quite bluntly. Even
Jesus Himself stated in the New
Testament Scriptures in Matthew
12:8 that, ".the Son of man is
Lord even of the Sabbath day."
Many forget the very first thing
recorded in the Bible itself is
work being done on Sunday in
Genesis 1:1-5. God in point of
fact commands all men to work upon
the first day of the week in the
heart of the Ten Commandments in
Exodus 20:8-11. He specifically
says in verse nine of that
Commandment that, "Six days shalt
thou labour, and do all thy work:"
Is it wrong for us to obey God?
Did not the apostles state in Acts
5:29 that, ".we ought to obey God
rather than men." God calls Sunday
a work day in Exodus 23:12; 31:15;
34:21; 35:2, Leviticus 23:3,
Deuteronomy 5:13, Ezekiel 46:1 and
Luke 13:14 as well.
"...as a solar festival, Sunday
was the sacred day of Mithra; and
it is interesting to notice that
since Mithra was addressed, as
Dominus, 'Lord," Sunday must have
been 'the Lord's Day' long before
Christian times." -The Paganism in
Our Christianity, Arthur Weigall,
1928, p136
The term "The Lord's day" was
first coined by John in the book
of Revelation for the New
Testament Christian church, yes.
But the Pagans of old used that
term to describe their "lord's
day" as well. When Constantine
demanded all Christians keep
Sunday holy in 321AD, he also
called it the "lord's day" at that
time. The warped history being
preached by pastors today, wherein
they changed what John referred to
as "Sabbath" to what the Pagan's
referred to as "Sunday" proves the
Vatican was involved in this
prophesied end time agenda. For
they have admitted time and time
again the following for all the
world to see.
"The [Catholic] Church took the
pagan philosophy and made it the
buckler of faith against the
heathen. She took the pagan Roman
Pantheon, temple of all the gods,
and made it sacred to all the
martyrs; so it stands to this day.
She took the pagan Sunday and made
it the Christian
Sunday. .The
sun has worshipers at this hour in
Persia and other lands . . . Hence
the Church would seem to say,
'Keep that old pagan name
[Sunday]. It shall remain
consecrated, sanctified.' And thus
the pagan Sunday, dedicated to
Balder, became the Christian
Sunday, sacred to Jesus"--William
L. Gildea, "Paschale Gaudium," in
The Catholic World, 58, March,
1894, p. 809 [A Roman Catholic
weekly].
As prophesied by Daniel 7:25, this
church has most assuredly tried to
change the "times and laws" of the
Creator God.
CLAIM #4. Mark
2:23-28 "And it came to pass, that
he went through the corn fields on
the sabbath day; and his disciples
began, as they went, to pluck the
ears of corn. And the
Pharisees said unto him, Behold,
why do they on the sabbath day
that which is not
lawful? And he said
unto them, Have ye never read what
David did, when he had need, and
was an hungred, he, and they that
were with him? How he
went into the house of God in the
days of Abiathar the high priest,
and did eat the shewbread, which
is not lawful to eat but for the
priests, and gave also to them
which were with
him? And he said unto
them, The sabbath was made for
man, and not man for the
sabbath: Therefore the
Son of man is Lord also of the
sabbath."
Some have recently started using
this passage to say the Sabbath is
no longer valid because Jesus
broke it, or disregarded it when
He was walking among us. First of
all, nowhere in this passage does
it say Jesus abolished or broke
the Sabbath. What it does say here
is the Pharisees assumed Jesus and
the apostles were breaking the
commandment by picking corn to
eat. Yet Jesus proves with
Scriptural facts regarding King
David, whom the Jews respected,
that He and His apostles were not
breaking Sabbath at all. Jesus
clearly corrected the false
teachings of the Pharisees here.
If it was ok for David to relieve
his hunger and the hunger of those
with him by eating bread that had
been consecrated and set apart for
holy use, then it was perfectly ok
for the disciples of Christ to
satisfy their hunger by plucking
the corn on Sabbath day as well.
Both David and the Apostles were
in God's employment. Basic reality
dictates the temple priests, and
even pastors today, perform
greater labors on each Sabbath as
they do God's work, do they not?
The same type of labor in secular
business would in fact be
considered sinful. However, the
work of the priests was in the
service of God. The labors they
performed each Sabbath pointed to
the redeeming power of Christ.
Their labor was in perfect harmony
with the object of the Sabbath day
so as to get the work done that
brought souls into the truth. But
now, Christ Himself had come, and
was walking among them. As all
Christians will agree, the
disciples, were employed by God to
do a holy and sanctified work.
They were merely doing that which
was necessary for the achievement
of their Heavenly appointed work
on Sabbath day. Jesus
confirmed this truth by stating He
is "Lord of the Sabbath." Seeing
how His apostles followed and
emulated Him, this proves they are
employed to do His work and
therefore free from guilt. Just
because the Pharisees didn't see
them as men employed by God
doesn't make it true.
Jesus or His apostles didn't break
the Sabbath here at all. Biblical
truth is, "sin is the
transgression of the law"
according to 1John 3:4. In other
words, breaking the Law of God is
how sin is committed. Commandment
#4 concerns the Sabbath day. To
say Jesus broke Sabbath, is to say
Jesus sinned by breaking God's
Law. This is exactly what the
Pharisees are trying to declare
here because they hated Him and
His message. Yet as Christians we
know Christ never sinned. Truth
is, if He did commit sin, He would
never have been that spotless Lamb
of God, and Saviour to you and me.
Jesus proved in Mark chapter two
that the Pharisees were in error
regarding a sin they invented
about plucking corn on Sabbath day
for Gospel workers. Yes, it would
be sin for those that harvested
corn for a living if done so on
the Sabbath. But Jesus and His
apostles were not employed as
farmers. They were simply hungry
men employed of God.
By the way, for those who assume
it is ok to break Sabbath by using
this passage, you are in reality
trusting the word of a
non-believing Pharisee, who was
just corrected and exposed as in
error by Jesus Christ Himself. In
other words, those that believe
the Jews were correct in their
assumptions, and ignore how Jesus
defended the Sabbath truth, and
corrected the lying Pharisees, are
in fact taking the word of the
Pharisees as truth over Christ. As
we all know, the Pharisees deny
Christ as Lord to this day. Who
then is telling the Truth? The
ones who know not the Word? Of the
one who wrote the Word Himself?
CLAIM #5.
Colossians 2:16-17 "Let
no man therefore judge you in
meat, or in drink, or in respect
of an holyday, or of the new moon,
or of the sabbath days: Which are
a shadow of things to come; but
the body is of Christ."
Simple truth here is, the
"sabbaths" mentioned here are not
the weekly Sabbath of the Lord.
Please read Leviticus 23:23-38 and
you will find that the sabbaths
mentioned in Colossians chapter 2
are the annual sabbaths, or what
most today refer to as "feast
days" that acknowledged certain
events that would be fulfilled in
the future when Christ came as
Messiah. This is why Paul referred
to them as "a shadow of things to
come" in this
passage. Make special
note that after it lists the
annual sabbaths in Leviticus
23:23-37 that it says in Verse 38
that these annual sabbaths are
"besides the Sabbath of the Lord."
In Matthew 5:17 Jesus said, "Think
not that I am come to destroy the
law, or the prophets: I am not
come to destroy, but to fulfil."
No one can "fulfill" a weekly
Sabbath because it points all the
way back to creation. That is why
the 4th Commandment starts with
the word "Remember" when speaking
of Sabbath. Keeping the Sabbath is
a day to worship the Creator of
all things. You simply cannot
"fulfill" an event that has
already passed. When those annual
sabbaths were instituted, it was
thousands of years before Jesus
would come to fulfill all that the
annual sabbaths were pointing to.
The children of God were
symbolically keeping the feast
days back then as a way to look
forward to the prophesied arrival
Messiah when He would actually
fulfill them in reality. For
example, even the lamb sacrifice
they offered for their sins back
then was a "shadow of things to
come," which was
fulfilled when ".the Lamb of God,
which taketh away the sin of the
world" (John 1:29) actually died
on the cross. This is why Jesus
said "it is finished" just before
He died in John 19:30.
Please read Leviticus 23:23-38 and
you will find FIVE annual
"sabbaths" are defined as "feast
days" of the Lord within a 15 day
period. This means they can in no
way be considered the weekly
Sabbath when 5 are kept within 15
days.
By the way, this is not the only
reason the sabbaths in Colossians
2:14-17 can't possibly be weekly
Sabbaths. When you read Leviticus
23:23-38 you will notice it talks
about the meat and drink offerings
mentioned in the same way they are
spoken of in Colossians 2:14-17.
If these annual sabbaths are the
same as the Sabbath mentioned in
the Law of God, then I must ask
all that use this passage to
preach Sunday as the Christian
Sabbath to please share with me
where in the Ten Commandments they
see "meat, drink,
holydays, or new moons"
as we see Colossians chapter 2
speaking of. I must also ask if
they do believe this verse
preaches such a thing, why don't
their Sunday keeping churches
honor "meat, drink, holydays, or
new moons" today?
The Law of God is not the same as
the law of Moses that Leviticus
and Colossians are obviously
referring to here. Moses law, or
"commandments contained in
ordinances" ended at
the cross as Ephesians 2:15
proved. And God's Law stands
forever as Luke 16:17 proclaimed.
Hebrews 9:1,10 says, "Then verily
the first covenant had also
ordinances of divine service, and
a worldly sanctuary. Which stood
only in meats and drinks, and
divers washings, and carnal
ordinances, imposed on them until
the time of reformation."
CLAIM #6. Galatians
4:9-11, "But now, after that ye
have known God, or rather are
known of God, how turn ye again to
the weak and beggarly elements,
whereunto ye desire again to be in
bondage? Ye observe days,
and months, and times, and years.
I am afraid of you, lest I have
bestowed upon you labour in vain.
Some believe this is speaking of
Sabbaths because the word "days"
in a way that suggests religious
observance. However, again we find
that the weekly Sabbath is not
mentioned here at all. If this is
read in context, we find that Paul
knew how the Galatians were at one
time Pagans, and therefore used to
ritualistic forms of worship. The
Jewish converts to Christianity,
like those in the book of
Colossians, wanted to continue on
with their feast days. Their
legalistic form of worship
appealed to the Galatians because
of their Pagan roots, and had to
be dealt with by Paul because he
hoped to prevent what we now see
happening today. Like today's
feast day movement, they sought to
mix the annual Sabbaths into New
Testament church worship. This
carnal law was only "until the
time of reformation" as we learned
earlier. By causing the Galatians
to fall for this error they were
able to eclipse the atoning work
of Christ on Calvary just as the
enemy of souls planned. By
observing these "days and months"
they were declaring their own
abilities, rather than Christ's
sacrifice suitable for salvation.
But the truth is it's "Not of
works, lest any man should boast."
(Ephesians 2:9) This is also why
Paul was concerned his preaching
to them was a "labour in vain"
because they were showing signs of
desiring to "be in
bondage" to the annual
sabbaths Jesus already declared
were "finished" at the cross. If
you notice, this is the same
method of twisting the false
preachers used with Colossians
2:16-17. Therefore the same method
of revelation can be used to
expose it. Where I ask in the
Commandments does it speak of
"days, months, times,
& years" as we see it
doing in Galatians? Since it
doesn't, this passage can't
possibly be speaking of the
Sabbath.
CLAIM #7.
Romans 14:5 "One man esteemeth one
day above another: another
esteemeth every day alike. Let
every man be fully persuaded in
his own mind.
Again, nowhere in this passage
does it say we should keep Sunday
as Sabbath. This is again speaking
of the annual holy-days that some
of the Jews still felt compelled
to keep. Most Gentile converts to
Christianity were not compelled to
keep such feast days. Many of the
Jews had difficulty in giving up
their life long traditions. A good
way to compare this with today's
Christian church is where some
keep Pagan holidays like Christmas
and Easter, where others prefer
not partake in such celebrations
and merrymaking. If they truly see
no wrong in this act, we are not
to judge them. We can try to warn
them of course, but that's where
our job ends. That's why it
clearly states, "Let every man be
fully persuaded in his own mind"
here. We cannot force any man to
believe anything we believe. By
the way, if you read all of Romans
14, you will discover the true
topic and find it was again taken
completely out of context.
God never rested on the first day
of the week. He never blessed it,
nor did His Son Jesus ever
acknowledge the first day of the
week in any way shape or form. The
Apostles never rested on it
either. In fact, the New Testament
Christians were never recorded as
being at rest on the first day of
the week in any historic
reference, or bible Scripture
known to man. If those that
believe such things would have
researched their own church
history they would have found that
in 321AD Constantine made the
Pagan Sunday sabbath law of the
land. Historic fact is, all
Christians kept Sabbath for
hundreds of years after Jesus
ascended. Think about that fact
for a moment. Had you known that,
you would have known before your
pastors spoke that every verse
ever used to suggest the Apostles
were part of, or even alive during
the Sabbath to Sunday change was a
bold faced lie because it was
never suggested to be changed
until 321AD, hundreds of years
after they died. When 321AD came,
only those Christians that feared
Roman rule and failed to trust God
kept Sunday as sabbath. The lying
preachers of today would have you
believe the Sabbath was changed
during the time the Bible was
penned. Historic, and biblical
fact is, they lied.
You cannot find one single line of
Scripture from Genesis to
Revelation that proclaims Sunday
to be blessed, sanctified, made
holy, or even enforced! Think
about that for a moment. NO LAW
was ever made by the God of
creation to enforce the first day
of the week. Romans 4:15, says
"...where no law is, there is no
transgression." You cannot commit
sin unless there is a law being
broken. Would not our Lord and
Saviour at least given us one
simple verse to proclaim Sunday as
the Sabbath if in fact He meant to
do such a thing? Why should we as
His followers consider something
holy that He never considered to
be holy? The reality here is that
it is simply called. "The first
day of the week" in all Scripture
from Genesis to Revelation.
One more thing should be mentioned
here. Many do claim that the day
Jesus rose from the dead is the
reason all should keep Sunday
holy. However, the Word of God is
quite clear about how we as
Christians are to acknowledge the
death and resurrection of Christ.
It is not as all the Sunday
preachers suggest by going to
church on Sunday. It is done by
baptism.
Romans 6:3-5, "Know ye not, that
so many of us as were baptized
into Jesus Christ were baptized
into his
death? Therefore we are
buried with him by baptism into
death: that like as Christ was
raised up from the dead by the
glory of the Father, even so we
also should walk in newness of
life. For if we have
been planted together in the
likeness of his death, we shall be
also in the likeness of his
resurrection:"
In other words, when you go under
the water, you symbolize and
acknowledge His death and burial.
When you come out of the water,
you symbolize and acknowledge His
resurrection. Merely stepping into
a church on the day He arose each
week simply cannot do this. In
fact, if His death and
resurrection was really the reason
for going to church on Sunday, why
is it no one goes to church every
Friday? Isn't that the day He
died?
A $10,000.00 CHALLENGE
Some years ago I posted on the
ministry website a challenge for
all pastors, preachers and even
bible studying Christians to find
a verse that declares God changed
the Sabbath from the seventh day
of the week to the first day of
the week. If they were able to
send the verse, I promised (and
still do) to send them $10,000.00
cash! Since then I have received
quite a few attempts from people
using the verses I shared in this
tract. Not a single pastor,
preacher, or bible teacher have
ever been able to find that verse.
What most people are unaware of
is, all of the religious leaders
have already agreed in writing
there is no such verse in the
Bible wherein it says God changed
the Sabbath from the day seven to
day one. This Sunday sabbath is
nothing more than a "TRADITION OF
MEN." (Mark 7:8)
Think about this as well. The Lord
thy God worked on that day when He
started creation. He even worked
on this day when He rose Jesus
from the dead 2000 years ago.
Biblical and historic fact is, He
actually rested and left His Son
in the tomb on the Sabbath day.
Even the New Testament Christian
women who went to anoint the body
of Jesus, stopped in their tracks
and decided not to anoint Him
because the Sabbath was drawing
near. Luke 23:56 tells us that
those women, "rested the Sabbath
day according to the commandment"
Without getting too technical.
It's easy to see that the Lord's
day is in fact the 7th day. This
same God that said in Malachi 3:6
"For I [am] the Lord, I change
not... " also said in Psalms 89:34
regarding this covenant that we
should ".not break, nor alter the
thing that is gone out of my
lips." The Sabbath is important
because ".the LORD made heaven and
earth, the sea, and all that in
them is, and rested the seventh
day: wherefore the LORD blessed
the sabbath day, and hallowed it."
(Exodus 20:11) And I Chronicles
17:27 says "...it shall
be blessed for ever."
If your church uses the scriptures
shared here to say Sunday is the
Sabbath, then the Lord plainly
says in Revelation 18:4 that you
should ".Come out of her, my
people, that ye be not partakers
of her sins, and that ye receive
not of her plagues."
After
all is said and done, if you
just read this entire tract, you
know that you just discovered
Biblical evidence that
absolutely every single verse
every used to claim Sunday is
the Sabbath was done so in a
deceptive manner to make
Scripture appear to say
something it never said. Some
will ask why have all the
churches done such an evil act
as this? In Daniel 7:25 we find
it prophesied that a beast would
"think to change" the Sabbath so
as to get "all the world" to
wonder after him as Revelation
13:3 predicts happens right
before the end of the World.
Look around. Do you see it
fulfilled? All Christian
churches now keep Sunday as
Sabbath, even though you now
know for a fact there is not a
single verse in the Christian
Bible to warrant such change as
this. In case you missed the
hint as to who it is that
changed the Sabbath earlier.
Perhaps the following will help.
Notice
the following documented
statements of the Vatican and
its prelates.
"Of
course the Catholic Church claims
that the change (Saturday Sabbath
to Sunday) was her act... And the
act is a MARK of her
ecclesiastical authority in
religious things." -H.F. Thomas,
Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons.
Nov. 11, 1895
"Sunday is our MARK of authority.
. .the church is above the Bible,
and this transference of Sabbath
observance is proof of that fact"
-Catholic Record of London,
Ontario Sept 1,1923.
"The Bible says, Remember that
thou keep holy the Sabbath day.
The Catholic church says, No! By
my divine power I abolish the
Sabbath day, and command you to
keep the first day of the week.
And lo, the entire civilized world
bows down in reverent obedience to
the command of the holy Catholic
church!" -Fr Enright,
C.S.S.R. History of the
Sabbath, p. 802
"Had she not such power, she could
not have done that in which all
modern religionists agree with
her; --she could not have
substituted the observance of
Sunday the first day of the week,
for the observance of Saturday the
seventh day, a change for which
there is no Scriptural authority."
-Rev. Stephan Keenan, A
Doctrinal Catechism, "On the
Obedience Due to the Church,"
chap. 2, p. 174. (Imprimatur,
John Cardinal McCloskey,
archbishop of New York.)
"Is not every Christian obliged to
sanctify Sunday and to abstain on
that day from unnecessary servile
work? Is not the observance of
this law among the most prominent
of our sacred duties? But you may
read the Bible from Genesis to
Revelation, and you will not find
a single line authorizing the
sanctification of Sunday. The
Scriptures enforce the religious
observance of Saturday, a day
which we never sanctify." -James
Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith
of Our Fathers (1917 ed.),
pp. 72, 73.
"Is
not yet too late for Protestants
to redeem themselves. Will they
do it?... will they indeed take
the written word only, the
Scripture alone, as their sole
authority and their sole
standard? Or will they still
hold the indefensible, self
contradictory, and suicidal
doctrine and practice of
following the authority of the
Catholic church and wear the
SIGN of her authority? Will they
keep the Sabbath of the Lord,
the seventh day, according to
Scripture? Or will they keep the
Sunday according to the
tradition of the Catholic
church, - Rome's Challenge, (Why
do Protestants keep Sunday?)
page 31
WHY
IS THE POPE DOING THIS? CLICK HERE!
ON LAST
THING...
|
"On
every page of God's word
the injunction to
obedience is plainly
written, and yet how
often His commands are
lightly regarded or
wholly set aside! The
command for the
observance of the holy
Sabbath of the Lord is
placed in the very bosom
of the decalogue, and is
so plain that none need
err as to its import,
and yet it is treated
with as great
profanation as were the
sacred vessels at the
feast of Belshazzar. The
condemnation of those
who trample upon God's
holy Sabbath will not
come because they have
conscientiously observed
the first day of the
week, but because they
neglected opportunities
for searching the
Scriptures and learning,
not what man has said,
not what the ministers
say, not what the
fathers have said, but
what saith the infinite
God! What day has God
specified as His holy
day? What did He command
men to honour when He
spoke with an audible
voice from Sinai? That
voice is to be obeyed
above every other; the
edicts of kings and
nations are void before
a command of God. The
Lord of hosts commands
our obedience."
-Bible Echo
September 17, 1894 par.
6
|
BACK
TO TOP
